Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-cascade-6] Specificity of Implicitly-Added `:scope` in Scoped Rules (#10196) from Miriam Suzanne via GitHub on 2024-04-19 (public-css-archive@w3.org from April 2024)

From: Miriam Suzanne via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2024 15:50:29 +0000
To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-2066848133-1713541827-sysbot+gh@w3.org>

> I would expect the `&` to have its regular "as if :is()"-specificity behavior…

That's what we intended, yes. See https://www.w3.org/TR/css-cascade-6/#example-66991251 for example.

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by mirisuzanne
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/10196#issuecomment-2066848133 using your GitHub account


-- 
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config

Received on Friday, 19 April 2024 15:50:30 UTC