Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions-2] Syntax for customizing transitions based on their type (#8960)

> The problem is, they're not actions. They're just 'tags'. It's down to the developer to decide how they're interpreted on the other side.

I see your point, actions is a bit over-opinionated.

> Feels like a generic name is better, since there's no policing of what the developer does with these 'tags'.

Any suggestions? Perhaps types or typeNames?
Tags reminds me too much of markup tags.

> My gut feeling is that the best practice would be for the outgoing page to provide 'information' rather than 'actions', and the incoming page will use this information to determine the action to take.



-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by noamr
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/8960#issuecomment-1723201708 using your GitHub account


-- 
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config

Received on Monday, 18 September 2023 11:14:58 UTC