- From: Oriol Brufau via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2023 14:27:32 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Yeah, a `<dimension-token>` is a single token, not `<number-token> <ident-token>`. So `width: 1 --fem` would be invalid just like `width: 1 px` or `width: 1/**/px`. And the spec already says > [A variable unit reference] has identical effects and restrictions to using [`var()`](https://drafts.csswg.org/css-variables-2/#funcdef-var) > If a property contains one or more [`var()`](https://drafts.csswg.org/css-variables-2/#funcdef-var) functions, and those functions are syntactically valid, the entire property’s grammar must be assumed to be valid at parse time. But I agree that the spec should refer to `<custom-property-name>` instead of `<dashed-indent>`. -- GitHub Notification of comment by Loirooriol Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/7379#issuecomment-1717744500 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Wednesday, 13 September 2023 14:27:35 UTC