- From: François Daoust via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2023 08:40:27 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
> I do not see any mention in CSS GCPM 4: are you are thinking to `:nth-of-page(n)`? I am not sure if the spec authors expect `<integer>` or `<an-b>`. There are mentions in CSS GCPM 3 and CSS Overflow 4 though. Sorry, `css-gcpm-4` is a typo, it should have been `css-gcpm-3`. I didn't include CSS Overflow 4 because, while it mentions `an+b`, it does not reference the `<an+b>` type, and the mentions are only there to alert about open issues in any case. > This PR might also be an opportunity to replace _"the An+B notation"_ with _"the `<an-b>` type"_, and `An+B` with `<an-b>` in value definitions, to fix #9494. I leave that up to spec editors, but how would that change help with #9494, which is more about updating Selectors 4 to use more formal definitions, and reference `<an-b>`, for pseudo-class selectors? -- GitHub Notification of comment by tidoust Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/pull/9480#issuecomment-1770336637 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Thursday, 19 October 2023 08:40:29 UTC