- From: Guillaume via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2023 11:47:47 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
> I didn't include CSS Overflow 4 because, while it mentions an+b, it does not reference the `<an+b>` type [...] Yeah, I realized it afterwards. <details> <summary>I am also fine with making changes for <code>css-gcpm-4</code> and <code>selectors-4</code> in another PR.</summary> Selectors 4 - `:nth-child(An+B [of S]?)` should be `:nth-child(<an-b> [of <complex-real-selector-list>]?)` - `:nth-last-child(An+B [of S]?)` should be `:nth-last-child(<an-b> [of <complex-real-selector-list>]?)` - `:nth-of-type(An+B)` should be `:nth-of-type(<an-b>)` - `:nth-last-of-type(An+B)` should be `:nth-of-type(<an-b>)` - `:nth-col(An+B)` should be `:nth-col(<an-b>)` - `:nth-last-col(An+B)` should be `:nth-last-col(<an-b>)` CSS GCPM 4 - `:nth-of-page(n)` should be `:nth-of-page(<an-b>)` (to be confirmed) </details> -- GitHub Notification of comment by cdoublev Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/pull/9480#issuecomment-1770734789 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Thursday, 19 October 2023 11:47:49 UTC