- From: Tab Atkins Jr. via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2023 19:10:32 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
> However, it does go slightly beyond moving the syntax around if it solves the named anchor change issue. Well, sure, but as we discussed internally, the named anchor change issue should end up being fixed anyway, with proper definition and reference to the machinery driving cq transitions. > what happens if you animate an inset property at the same time as animating the position package I'm open to whatever behavior in that case. We could snapshot, or live-update, whatever's more reasonable for impls. There's no user argument for one behavior or another. -- GitHub Notification of comment by tabatkins Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/9598#issuecomment-1821520584 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Tuesday, 21 November 2023 19:10:34 UTC