- From: Miriam Suzanne via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2023 19:32:46 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
I have some opinions about syntax – I don't see any gain from customizing the name of a return-value descriptor, or forcing it to match the function name – but for the most part my goal with this issue was to get confirmation that we want to pursue something along these lines. Functionally, I don't see a big difference between `@apply foo(parameters);` or eg `++foo: parameters;`, and I'd be happy to bikeshed all of these details in more focused issues. So my focus here is on getting a resolution about taking up the broader project (either functions, or mixins, or both), and then we can open those other issues and continue with more focused discussions on syntax and behavior. -- GitHub Notification of comment by mirisuzanne Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/9350#issuecomment-1806326276 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Friday, 10 November 2023 19:32:48 UTC