- From: Guillaume via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 05 May 2023 08:55:08 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
cdoublev has just created a new issue for https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts: == [css-conditional-3] Define `<declaration>` == `<declaration>` is only used in the prelude of `@supports`: > ``` > <supports-in-parens> = ( <supports-condition> ) | <supports-feature> | <general-enclosed> > <supports-feature> = <supports-decl> > <supports-decl> = ( <declaration> ) > ``` `<supports-decl>` should evaluate to `true` if the UA supports the `<declaration>` in a style rule. I would like to clarify if `unknown-property: var(--custom)` or `color: invalid-value` match `<declaration>` or `<general-enclosed>`. In #8127, I proposed to define `<style-feature>` (in the prelude of `@container`) with `<declaration> | <ident>` but this seemed to be a problem for some people. It was preferred that `<general-enclosed>` match the above inputs, to avoid storing an invalid declaration. Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/8795 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Friday, 5 May 2023 08:55:10 UTC