- From: Tab Atkins Jr. via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 04 May 2023 19:01:51 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Yes, you're right, and it's an issue I noticed in the past when trying to use additive to do things like this. I ended up considering it niche enough to not need addressing, since it would complicate the additive syntax significantly, and the existing real-world additive systems didn't use it (they do indeed skip digits with 0 value). We'd probably want a more explicit generation form that was explicitly base-N and took a list of symbols to use for each digit in a given place. Or just have another descriptor that appends to the generated representation, to address the use-case more directly. -- GitHub Notification of comment by tabatkins Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/8619#issuecomment-1535261187 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Thursday, 4 May 2023 19:01:53 UTC