- From: Vitor Roriz via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2023 09:50:59 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
@r12a These are great points, thanks for joining the thread. Can you give more details on: > But it may be more problematic if they have been set in concrete by the browser, making it difficult to change them The current specification allow authors to extend a rule and redefine specific descriptors of them, with `system: extends <name>`. So, if author would prefer a specific `suffix`, it would be quite easy to just extend an existent style and alter just that descriptor. Or they could even override most UA counter-styles, by redefining the rule with the same name. So I thought it wouldn't be so hard to change them. Or do you mean that if author needs to extend a UA style, they could define it as they want directly so it wouldn't be such a useful feature for them anyway? -- GitHub Notification of comment by vitorroriz Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/8636#issuecomment-1594421119 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Friday, 16 June 2023 09:51:01 UTC