- From: Joey Arhar via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2023 14:30:18 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
It sounds like we have these potential property names: 1. 😄 `transition-mode` 2. 🎉 `transition-type` 3. ❤️ `transition-animation-type` 4. 🚀 `transition-discrete` - @fantasai mentioned that "mode" and "type" are vague - @smfr mentioned that "discrete" is hard for non-native english speakers - The property values we choose might impose a particular property name and vice-versa Property values: 1. `normal | discrete` 2. `normal | animatable` 3. `interpolable | discrete` 4. `interpolable | animatable` 5. `auto | all | none` - @flackr mentioned that `normal | animatable` would be good because using animatable rather than discrete matches exactly the spec terminology for what will be transitioned - anything that can be animated - Assuming that these property values will appear in a shorthand, I like `discrete` since I think it makes the following easier to understand imo: `transition: discrete display 0.2s, interpolable color 0.5s;` - If we allow in the future for smooth interpolations between `auto` and `123px` for properties like `height`, would we want to add a new value? Or reuse the opt-in value `discrete`/`animatable`/`all`? -- GitHub Notification of comment by josepharhar Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/8857#issuecomment-1591335579 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Wednesday, 14 June 2023 14:30:19 UTC