Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-text-3] Reconsider atomic inlines overriding GL/WJ classes (#8972)

The CSS Working Group just discussed `[css-text-3] Reconsider atomic inlines overriding GL/WJ classes`, and agreed to the following:

* `RESOLVED: accept proposal`

<details><summary>The full IRC log of that discussion</summary>
&lt;florian> fantasai: we have a problem that line breaking around images is weird<br>
&lt;florian> fantasai: people expect images to introduced a line breaking opportunity<br>
&lt;florian> [fantasai summarizes the issue]<br>
&lt;Rossen_> q?<br>
&lt;florian> fantasai: the proposal is that for Unicode characters with non tailorable line breaking properties, other than NBSP, should be honored and and take precedence<br>
&lt;florian> +1<br>
&lt;florian> florian: +1<br>
&lt;florian> iank_: not too familiar with the implementation details, will sync with Koji before a definite answer<br>
&lt;florian> iank_: seems ok<br>
&lt;florian> fantasai: main concern is probably not implementation complexity, but web compat, but it seems ok here<br>
&lt;florian> iank_: is there any complexity with ?<br>
&lt;florian> s/with ?/with reordering controls/<br>
&lt;florian> fantasai: there's only a handful of characters<br>
&lt;florian> fantasai: should not have any effect on bidi<br>
&lt;florian> q+<br>
&lt;florian> iank_: seems fine, just want to check with Koji<br>
&lt;florian> q-<br>
&lt;florian> Rossen_: can we resolve on it, and you bring it back if there's an issue<br>
&lt;hober> q+<br>
&lt;florian> hober: similar to Ian, I want to talk internally, like with the books people<br>
&lt;Rossen_> ack hober<br>
&lt;florian> hober: can bring it back later if we have additional feedback<br>
&lt;florian> RESOLVED: accept proposal<br>
</details>


-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by css-meeting-bot
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/8972#issuecomment-1646217049 using your GitHub account


-- 
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config

Received on Friday, 21 July 2023 20:42:06 UTC