Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-transforms-2] Syntax of individual transforms should reflect general CSS syntax (#7646)

So I think there's a definitely nontrivial cost to adding these, in particular because it requires adding support for separately animating translate-x, translate-y, and translate-z, etc., on the compositor.

If there are strong use cases for the splitting I think that complexity could be justified, but I don't think we should do this just "because a lot of other CSS properties do it", since I think it has significantly more implementation cost than for many other CSS properties.

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by dbaron
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/7646#issuecomment-1646215265 using your GitHub account


-- 
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config

Received on Friday, 21 July 2023 20:39:49 UTC