- From: Tab Atkins Jr. via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2023 23:11:00 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Right - how does that help authors? Either infinite lookahead is feasible, in which case they can write `div &` (*or* `:is(div) &`, tho they wouldn't), or it's not feasible, in which case they can write `:is(div) &`. Disallowing them from writing *either* (*and* disallowing them from writing `.foo &`, which they'd be able to do in either case) until we figure out which case it'll be doesn't seem to help anyone. -- GitHub Notification of comment by tabatkins Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/8249#issuecomment-1397728581 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Thursday, 19 January 2023 23:11:02 UTC