- From: Alan Stearns via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2023 23:06:57 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Here is my reasoning, which is not based on scrapping anything. A. Start by allowing nesting forms with a mandatory leading & (so that people have *something* to ship now) B. Keep investigating lookahead C1. If lookahead is feasible, never do the :is() thing. When a UA can do lookahead, then they can ship the rest of nesting (and make & optional where possible C2. If lookahead is not feasible, UAs can ship the rest of option 3 -- GitHub Notification of comment by astearns Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/8249#issuecomment-1397725429 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Thursday, 19 January 2023 23:07:00 UTC