- From: Oriol Brufau via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2023 00:36:47 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
> And what about `grid-auto-flow: 1 / 1 / 10 / 10`? I was thinking that the auto-placement algorithm could be restricted to only place in that the specified area instead of all the grid, and it could be used in combination with `[ row | column ] || dense`. And when the area is filled, then it goes back to the beginning or keeps reusing the last cell? Not sure if that's useful in general. I didn't give it much thought TBH. With `grid-items-column` and `grid-items-row` then it's clear that the items would span the specified tracks. > could it be `grid-auto-flow: stack`? What would this do if `grid-template` defines multiple tracks? Authors might want to chose on which cell the items will stack. > Should I update the title & description to smth. else? I mean, you can still ask for a new display value, but a new grid feature that also addresses other usecases like #4002 seems more likely to be added. You can update if you are no longer asking for the display value. -- GitHub Notification of comment by Loirooriol Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/8321#issuecomment-1386290432 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Wednesday, 18 January 2023 00:36:49 UTC