- From: Quentin Albert via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2023 05:21:20 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
> I was thinking that the auto-placement algorithm could be restricted to only place in that the specified area instead of all the grid, and it could be used in combination with `[ row | column ] || dense`. And when the area is filled, then it goes back to the beginning or keeps reusing the last cell? Not sure if that's useful in general. I didn't give it much thought TBH. I can't think of a use case where one of these scenarios would be more useful than just spanning. I mean the only thing different from the normal grid flow would be the reusing of the cells right? Would it make sense to combine the naming of these two? e.g. `grid-auto-flow-column`, `grid-auto-flow-row`, `grid-auto-flow-area` ... I don't see it being used as grid-auto-flow in combination with the keywords, if the element would always be spanning row-column and dense would make no sense in combination with these. This whole thing also seems like a good addition to subgrid in my opinion. -- GitHub Notification of comment by Que-tin Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/8321#issuecomment-1386505835 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Wednesday, 18 January 2023 05:21:22 UTC