- From: Chris Lilley via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2023 13:40:33 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
So: - @tabatkins [is fine with `<number>`](https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/7876#issuecomment-1282797648), - @LeaVerou [wanted `<number-percentage>`](https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/7876#issuecomment-1278038929) which isn't possible, but [earlier said `<number>` was fine](https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/7876#issuecomment-1277935443), and - I argued for `<number>` [because if the implementation resolves percentages, that is less error prone than the user doing it](https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/7876#issuecomment-1277943108). No-one has argued for `<percentage>` only, and it is agreed that the channel keywords need to resolve to a single type. In the interest of having concrete text to discuss on the call today, I am going to do the edits to make all channel keywords resolve to `<number>`. -- GitHub Notification of comment by svgeesus Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/7876#issuecomment-1378768798 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Wednesday, 11 January 2023 13:40:35 UTC