- From: Andrew Somers via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2023 13:04:51 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
> Closing, as this suggestion diverges significantly from the well-established syntax patterns used by existing preprocessors, which the WG has repeatedly chosen to stick close to. Thank you @tabatkins I was concerned about diverging, but then, that is part of the discussion/issue of nesting in the first place. > ***...the well-established syntax patterns...*** Where can I find the document that defines the well-established syntax patterns for reference? Thank you -- GitHub Notification of comment by Myndex Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/7877#issuecomment-1378719442 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Wednesday, 11 January 2023 13:04:53 UTC