- From: andruud via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2023 19:54:57 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
[Why is it that the second css-nesting comes into the picture there's a list with options and suboptions? :P] (2a) I'm not sure it's very consistent to disable the implied `:scope` when nothing in the selector actually represents `:scope`. 2b seems more consistent. -- GitHub Notification of comment by andruud Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/8377#issuecomment-1433631343 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Thursday, 16 February 2023 19:54:59 UTC