- From: Tab Atkins Jr. via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2023 17:40:20 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Yup, this makes a lot of sense. The confusion argument for introducing clamp() in the first place still applies when you're only clamping from one side, so making that easy seems like an obvious win. (I'm pretty strongly opposed to the alternative "just omit the argument, but keep the comma in" syntax, as that violates our comma-elision rules, and those exist for a good reason. But the `none` syntax is great.) -- GitHub Notification of comment by tabatkins Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/9713#issuecomment-1858246565 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Friday, 15 December 2023 17:40:22 UTC