- From: Oriol Brufau via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2023 18:30:59 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
> fantasai: I think that we need to somehow make this work, so we should just accept this syntax for both things then figure out var() resolution I disagree, this isn't something that can be addressed in a quick follow-up. It's more or less the same problem as #1282, which has been open for 6.5 years with still no clear proposal. So I'm opposed to adding logical values with no plan about how to handle them. It's not like `var()` is the only problem either, there are some CSSOM implications that would need to be figured out for shorthands whose longhand expansion varies. -- GitHub Notification of comment by Loirooriol Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/549#issuecomment-1856378331 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Thursday, 14 December 2023 18:31:01 UTC