Re: [csswg-drafts] [scroll-animations] Broader scope of scroll timelines (#7759)

@bramus / @flackr Yeah, I was trying to make each part of the "ground truth" (i.e. each longhand) more simple and give each thing as few jobs as possible. Then make the shorthand responsible for useful abstractions on top of that. (In _theory_ that should be reasonable). So making `-name` behave "kind of like `-root`, sometimes" hurts. :-)

> Would be weird, no?

Yes. No. Maybe. I can't tell.

> Or maybe you just made the case for the longhands being impractical, and we should just have scroll-timeline and scroll-timeline-root properties?

Not making that case, this idea was discarded already? If longhands are too long, use the shorthand. :P

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by andruud
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/7759#issuecomment-1526588039 using your GitHub account


-- 
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config

Received on Thursday, 27 April 2023 22:05:35 UTC