- From: Johannes Odland via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2022 15:53:45 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
> Is this proposal and [w3c/css-houdini-drafts#857](https://github.com/w3c/css-houdini-drafts/issues/857) mutually exclusive (under the same function syntax), or can they co-exist? Hopefully :) I closed the issue when I was made aware of [w3c/css-houdini-drafts#857](https://github.com/w3c/css-houdini-drafts/issues/857) but it was reopened by @dbaron opened after this comment: > Yeah, I agree that this is worth keeping open in case we want to do this first. @tabatkins wrote later the same day: > This would be a simple declarative version of the more full-featured, JS-driven Houdini feature linked there. I imagine they'd live in the same namespace and registered Houdini functions override @function declarations of the same name. -- GitHub Notification of comment by johannesodland Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/7490#issuecomment-1257222527 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Sunday, 25 September 2022 15:53:47 UTC