- From: Johannes Odland via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2022 19:56:57 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
> ```css > .a .b { > .c :is(.a .b) {} > } > ``` Did you mean to keep the nesting, or: ```css .c :is(.a .b) {} ``` I think it would be good to document this. I think it would be good to explain why it was designed this way as well. Probably this as well: ```css .a { .b .c { } } /* equivalent to .a :is(.b .c) { } */ ``` -- GitHub Notification of comment by johannesodland Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/7969#issuecomment-1293998650 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Thursday, 27 October 2022 19:56:58 UTC