- From: Johannes Odland via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2022 19:56:57 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
> ```css
> .a .b {
>   .c :is(.a .b) {}
> }
> ```
Did you mean to keep the nesting, or:
```css
  .c :is(.a .b) {}
```
I think it would be good to document this. I think it would be good to explain why it was designed this way as well. 
Probably this as well:
```css
.a {
  .b .c { }
}
/* equivalent to 
.a :is(.b .c) { }
*/
```
-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by johannesodland
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/7969#issuecomment-1293998650 using your GitHub account
-- 
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Thursday, 27 October 2022 19:56:58 UTC