- From: Lea Verou via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2022 19:55:15 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
@romainmenke > > I'm concerned this may not be true, e.g. I remember some proposal to use {} to set multiple longhands to different values without having to repeat all the name, like > > Can we start a list of all the stuff we are sacrificing specifically to make this style of nesting possible? > > I don't think we can really judge the impact of all this without mapping it out exactly. I understand that you and a couple other people from #7834 feel very strongly about this. However, can we please keep that discussion in #7834? I opened a separate issue specifically so we could discuss implementation challenges. Whether this syntax is *possible* is orthogonal to whether it's *desirable* (though polling authors has shown time and time again that it is). --- @Loirooriol Declarations *starting* with `{` should be feasible (@tabatkins can correct me), since that's unambiguous, as pseudo-classes cannot be empty, so that in particular would be doable. What wouldn't be is declarations using pairs of braces somewhere in the middle. -- GitHub Notification of comment by LeaVerou Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/7961#issuecomment-1293997070 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Thursday, 27 October 2022 19:55:17 UTC