Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-nesting-1] Can we relax the syntax further? (#7961) from Oriol Brufau via GitHub on 2022-10-27 (public-css-archive@w3.org from October 2022)

From: Oriol Brufau via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2022 19:41:07 +0000
To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-1293983135-1666899665-sysbot+gh@w3.org>

I know pseudo-classes can't be empty, that's why I said "hypothetical". Still, the concern is that, if I'm reading the previous comments right, to avoid ambiguities when parsing, declarations couldn't have `{}`, so the proposal to use `{}` for setting longhands would be lost.

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by Loirooriol
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/7961#issuecomment-1293983135 using your GitHub account


-- 
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config

Received on Thursday, 27 October 2022 19:41:08 UTC