- From: Lea Verou via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2022 19:07:52 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
> Strictly speaking is not a combinator but it kinda behaves like a combinator and probably should have been a combinator and #7346 resolved to work on actual combinators for accessing pseudo-elements. > > I don't get your rearranging argument, `.foo > .bar > .baz` can't be rearranged either as `.foo > .baz > .bar` or something, it's normal not being able to rearrange complex selectors. That's actually an argument in favor of `::` behaving kinda like a combinator. I didn't mean that kind of rearranging, but that with combinators you can do things like `.foo > :is(.bar) > .baz`, adjust whitespace etc because they are separate tokens. I'm still missing the explanation on how your pseudo-element example differs between the nested and non-nested version. -- GitHub Notification of comment by LeaVerou Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/7433#issuecomment-1287339637 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Friday, 21 October 2022 19:07:54 UTC