- From: Xiaocheng Hu via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2022 18:58:46 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
> So the currently specced behavior is just a little too restrictive Do you mean the currently specced behavior is the expected behavior or not? I think the current behavior is already current, and we just need to restrict the current [tree-scoped reference spec](https://w3c.github.io/csswg-drafts/css-scoping/#shadow-names)'s inheritance behavior to names defined by at-rules only. My understanding of that spec is: it was designed with only at-rules in mind. In particular, the "inheritance" behavior makes sense to me only for at-rules. For other names, it seems better to just restrict them to the same tree scope. (Btw, I think we have the same issue for counter names) -- GitHub Notification of comment by xiaochengh Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/7916#issuecomment-1287332002 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Friday, 21 October 2022 18:58:48 UTC