Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-shared-element-transitions-1] Define "active animation" used to signal end of transition (#7785)

> "execlude non monotonically increasing timelines", right?

Sorry I meant to say "Agreed on excluding all timelines other than Document timelines".

> The main difference I guess is that these are still being controlled by the author, as opposed to, e.g. scroll-linked ones, that are controlled entirely by the user.

That's the main rationale for excluding them, the scroll-linked ones rely on the user. Technically you could have a JS driven scroll but I suspect that's not the main use-case and it'll end up being a footgun. Pausing document timeline animations don't have this issue. Am I missing something there?

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by khushalsagar
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/7785#issuecomment-1275140338 using your GitHub account


-- 
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config

Received on Tuesday, 11 October 2022 18:58:32 UTC