- From: Yehonatan Daniv via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 08 Oct 2022 09:20:58 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
> but excluding monotonically increasing timelines. I'm confused, I think you mean: "execlude _non_ monotonically increasing timelines", right? Also, with regard to that, the whole idea of paused animations is that the author may drive these using rAF to any direction, including backwards. The main difference I guess is that these are still being controlled by the author, as opposed to, e.g. scroll-linked ones, that are controlled entirely by the user. Does this defeat the idea of including paused animations? -- GitHub Notification of comment by ydaniv Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/7785#issuecomment-1272275357 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Saturday, 8 October 2022 09:20:59 UTC