- From: davidsgrogan via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2022 21:37:00 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
> after all, the transferred size suggestion _already_ invokes the aspect-ratio, so why should we invoke it _again_ in the content size suggestion? Well, the transferred size suggestion only applies to replaced elements so it doesn't already invoke the aspect-ratio for these non-replaced cases. So currently, the only thing that invokes the aspect-ratio for non-replaced elements is the content size suggestion. Even with that said, I think your proposal is good, at least as far as flex is concerned (Ian might have non-flex reasons to define this behavior the way he proposed it). I think it also makes flex's automatic minimum size always equal aspect-ratio's automatic minimum size. So we don't have to define what to do when they conflict. -- GitHub Notification of comment by davidsgrogan Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6794#issuecomment-1063396436 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Wednesday, 9 March 2022 21:37:01 UTC