- From: Rune Lillesveen via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2022 12:01:40 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
I think the discussion above should be enough for CSSWG members to re-consider whether shadow-including or flat tree ancestor containers could be queried. If we decide to change, the PROPOSED RESOLUTION would be: Change the two instances of "shadow-including" in section 4 of css-contain-3 to "flat tree". -- GitHub Notification of comment by lilles Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5984#issuecomment-1059102106 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Friday, 4 March 2022 12:01:42 UTC