- From: Chris Lilley via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2022 15:39:58 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
> So when counting independent implementations, please don't exclude candidates based on their target medium, especially when the specification targets that exact medium. This used to be easier: Shepherd had a way to manually upload test results from non-browser implementations, although each test had to be run by importing it, one by one, looking at the PDF or whatever output it used, and then jotting down in a file the pass or failure. We now have on WPT automated running of all tests - but in four browsers, three of which use different engines, and with no way to inject non-browser test results. And no way to get results for tests that require a human to judge the pass/fail (so gradients are entirely un-tested, for example). -- GitHub Notification of comment by svgeesus Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6435#issuecomment-1170139635 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Wednesday, 29 June 2022 15:39:59 UTC