- From: Brian Birtles via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2022 00:24:10 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
> I agree that `ease()` or `easing()` is not appropriate because this is just one particular way of defining a custom easing function (using linear segments).
Also, the property for using these functions in Web animations is called [`easing`](https://drafts.csswg.org/web-animations-1/#dom-effecttiming-easing) and there has been a proposal to introduce an `animation-easing` property to CSS animations that would allow setting the easing across all keyframes (as opposed to per-keyframe). In either case, a function with `easing` in the name would be a little redundant, as in `{ easing: 'easing(...)' }` or `animation-easing: easing(...)`.
--
GitHub Notification of comment by birtles
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/7419#issuecomment-1169409630 using your GitHub account
--
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Wednesday, 29 June 2022 00:24:12 UTC