- From: Romain Menke via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2022 12:43:19 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
> Have you found something that could work better? No and I think `:>` is very expressive and the best choice for the feature. I've also been looking at the other side in tools -> how many bugs there are because `.foo::before` is seen as a compound selector and this is quite extensive. _4 of those were created by me in PostCSS plugins._ So my initial opinion has changed from "this will be a lot of work" to "this will be a lot of work and a whole class of bugs might get fixed" -- GitHub Notification of comment by romainmenke Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/7346#issuecomment-1161698031 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Tuesday, 21 June 2022 12:43:20 UTC