- From: Tab Atkins Jr. via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2022 22:35:31 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
This is actually legit, since the example straight up doesn't make sense right now - it's claiming an https url is "different scheme" from the main url, which is also https. It looks like someone just hit one of the urls with a regex at some point, or maybe just hypercorrected out of reflex? Regardless, either the example base url needs to be switched back to http, or the font urls listed below it need to have their schemes swapped to match the comments. -- GitHub Notification of comment by tabatkins Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/pull/7337#issuecomment-1159282038 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Friday, 17 June 2022 22:35:32 UTC