Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-fonts-4] Should `font-variant-emoji` be included in the `font-variant` shorthand? (#7315)

Yeah, font-variant-emoji came later, doesn’t use the same implementation mechanism as the rest of the font-variant longhands, and used to be named something like emoji-presentation (but got renamed to its current name).

I don’t know why it got renamed to its current name. As things lie now, I don’t think I have an opinion on this shorthand issue.

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by litherum
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/7315#issuecomment-1158313748 using your GitHub account


-- 
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config

Received on Friday, 17 June 2022 00:12:09 UTC