Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-color-5] Invalid value definition of `<rgb()>` (#7363)

> I could understand the first 2 being removed also, as the 3rd seems encompassing of the syntax options. Alternatively, I could see the first two being moved into an aside and provided as simpler, less feature rich and legacy, versions of the syntax for those looking for it?

That would mean things like `rgb(255 40% 100%)` are valid. Do we want that?

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by LeaVerou
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/7363#issuecomment-1157417738 using your GitHub account


-- 
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config

Received on Thursday, 16 June 2022 09:05:49 UTC