- From: Yehonatan Daniv via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2022 08:34:06 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
@SebastianZ > I expected the images generated by an @image-manipulation rule to always be cached because the manipulations are only applied once to an image. Or are there use cases, in which dynamically applying the rules is required? Other use cases are the old `filter()` and others mentioned at the top, which could potentially be animated. So does this rule imply immutability of the result without the ability to animate its properties? I guess further animations could be applied in properties outside of the manipulation effects, which is reasonable. -- GitHub Notification of comment by ydaniv Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6807#issuecomment-1153635060 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Monday, 13 June 2022 08:34:08 UTC