- From: Oriol Brufau via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2022 22:14:05 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
`::` is combinator-like so I think it wouldn't be that unreasonable to treat it different in relative selectors as I initially assumed, but fine, it's not a combinator, I'm not pushing for a change. Just wanted to note that `:has(::foo)` may not behave as one would expect, and checking for pseudo-elements in `:has()` will have a severe limitation until `:>` is added. -- GitHub Notification of comment by Loirooriol Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/7463#issuecomment-1352289604 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Wednesday, 14 December 2022 22:14:07 UTC