- From: Guillaume via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2022 15:11:43 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
I would prefer that option 2 (`:>`) in Oriol's comment becomes real and that `div:has(before)` implicitly means `div:has(:> before)`, ie. an implicit pseudo-element descendent combinator would be assumed. So you would have to write `.foo { :> before {} }` instead of `.foo { ::before {} }`. -- GitHub Notification of comment by cdoublev Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/7979#issuecomment-1351596843 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Wednesday, 14 December 2022 15:11:45 UTC