- From: Ilya Streltsyn via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2022 18:08:50 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Good point! Since we already have two shipped implementations in two most popular engines, does marking `:has()` as "at-risk" still make any sense? -- GitHub Notification of comment by SelenIT Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3925#issuecomment-1334157682 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Thursday, 1 December 2022 18:08:51 UTC