- From: Robert Flack via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2022 17:36:06 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
> * Remove the `phase` API from Web Animations 1, and remove the before/after concepts, keeping just active/inactive states. FYI, removing the phase API and before/after from web-animations-1 was already resolved in #7240 > * Add shorthand that expands a phase name to 0% start delay and 100% end delay. E.g. `animation-phase: contain` expands to `animation-delay: contain 0%; animation-end-delay: contain 100%`. @birtles I wanted to get your take on the phase naming here. I agree that the term phase is overloading a concept that we already have in animations (even if it's currently not really a factor in timelines with them being either active or inactive) with something that isn't the same. How about a vote on possible alternatives with emoji reactions? Feel free to comment and suggest alternatives: 👍 animation-phase: enter; 😄 animation-range: enter; 🎉 animation-time-range: enter; -- GitHub Notification of comment by flackr Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/7044#issuecomment-1216946378 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Tuesday, 16 August 2022 17:36:07 UTC