- From: Chris Lilley via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2021 11:43:00 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
> How different is an ICC file from the ICC chunk in images? That was my point in [comment](https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5552#issuecomment-700667795) - identical, just transferred as a separate resource rather than included inside a raster image. For example [definition of the **iCCP Embedded ICC profile** chunk in PNG](https://w3c.github.io/PNG-spec/#11iCCP): <html><body> <!--StartFragment--> Profile name | 1-79 bytes (character string) -- | -- Null separator | 1 byte (null character) Compression method | 1 byte Compressed profile | n bytes <!--EndFragment--> </body> </html> > I haven't checked other browsers, but Firefox parses ICC in JPEG, PNG, BMP, WebP, AVIF so I imagine most browsers do. That parser is effectively exposed to the web already. Correct. -- GitHub Notification of comment by svgeesus Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5552#issuecomment-940930809 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Tuesday, 12 October 2021 11:43:02 UTC