- From: Dominik Röttsches via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 06 Oct 2021 09:51:10 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
I understood it was mainly a TAG recommendation / invitation to explore options. Since we arrived at a `@supports` based syntax + `@when`/`@if` I did not see a need for a somewhat redundant solution but I agree that there is a practical advantage to the `format()` syntax in src:, in particular until `@when`/`@if` arrives. If a flat list of keywords is acceptable inside a `format()` , and the two specs refer to the same list, no objections from my side to harmonizing the two syntaxes/keyword-lists, defining a list of keywords in CSS fonts that both spec texts refer to and renaming `font-technology()` to `font-format()` in CSS conditionals 4 and. I can try to prepare draft PRs. -- GitHub Notification of comment by drott Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6520#issuecomment-935870073 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Wednesday, 6 October 2021 09:51:11 UTC