W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-archive@w3.org > May 2021

Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-lists] Omitted start value of reversed list isn't calculated right (#6233)

From: Simon Pieters via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 20 May 2021 23:39:45 +0000
To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-845551586-1621553982-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Hmm, how embarrassing. I somehow had the wrong idea about how `<li value>` affects subsequent list items. I thought they didn't affect the next list item, but it does. I tested the example in https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6233#issuecomment-845293292 but somehow must have glossed over the "4". :-/

That makes my previous assumption not very useful.

I agree that 21 for the first list item in that example would be ideal. Also, 19 and 9 matches what browsers do already.

So we are in agreement 👍

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by zcorpan
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6233#issuecomment-845551586 using your GitHub account


-- 
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Thursday, 20 May 2021 23:39:48 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 5 July 2022 06:42:33 UTC