W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-archive@w3.org > May 2021

Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-lists] Omitted start value of reversed list isn't calculated right (#6233)

From: Tab Atkins Jr. via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 20 May 2021 20:55:29 +0000
To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-845470565-1621544126-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
We'd be doing that if we take the counter-increment into account too, right?

I suspect it's fine, as <ol reversed> isn't commonly used right now, especially in conjunction with <li value>. But that's just my intuition.

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by tabatkins
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/6233#issuecomment-845470565 using your GitHub account


-- 
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Thursday, 20 May 2021 20:55:31 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 20:27:23 UTC