- From: CSS Meeting Bot via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 19 May 2021 16:57:10 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
The CSS Working Group just discussed `[css-contain] :root/body viewport propagation and containment`, and agreed to the following: * `RESOLVED: specify this in CSS Contain` * `RESOLVED: If the used value of contain is other than the default we break propagation` <details><summary>The full IRC log of that discussion</summary> <dael> Topic: [css-contain] :root/body viewport propagation and containment<br> <dael> github: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5913#issuecomment-836692271<br> <dael> futhark: I was not in APAc so clarification. Resolution says stops prop if there is containment. Applied or contain property?<br> <dael> futhark: Does paint containment stop it? Any containment?<br> <dael> futhark: And then there is which spec does this go into? Varios specs that talk about prop or the CSS Contain spec?<br> <dael> futhark: I don't know if anybody had opinions<br> <dael> astearns: So where does this get specified?<br> <dael> florian: Suggest contain spec, possibley with notes<br> <dael> astearns: Objections to spec this in CSS Contain<br> <dael> RESOLVED: specify this in CSS Contain<br> <dael> astearns: What types of containment change prop?<br> <dael> astearns: Any non-default or all of the values that create a container?<br> <dael> futhark: Problem with those that establish a container is we may need to change behavior as we add values<br> <dael> futhark: Can spec as the containment nec to establish a container but that breaks content if you use containment for all things<br> <dael> astearns: Downside to saying we break prop for non-default value?<br> <dael> futhark: Don't think so. Not strictly necessary<br> <dael> florian: Feels overkill, but is it really bad?<br> <dael> fantasai: My thoughts exactly<br> <dael> florian: We're not effecting any amount of prop from root, it's from body to root?<br> <dael> futhark: Body to viewport and potentially root<br> <dael> futhark: Also for applied containment. Used or applied<br> <dael> astearns: Sounds like your preference is that if the used value of containment is other than default it breaks prop<br> <dael> futhark: Yep<br> <dael> astearns: Slgihtly worried that things which use contain:paint might depend on prop but can't think of a reason<br> <iank_> I think its a non-issue here<br> <dael> florian: Absense of container quereis doing containment on body might not be common<br> <dael> astearns: Prop: If the used value of contain is other than the default we break propagation<br> <dael> astearns: Obj?<br> <dael> RESOLVED: If the used value of contain is other than the default we break propagation<br> <chrishtr> \o/<br> <dael> astearns: other questions on your list?<br> <dael> futhark: no<br> <florian> s/Absense of container quereis doing containment on body might not be common/In the absense of container quereis, doing containment on body might not be common, so we're probably fine/<br> </details> -- GitHub Notification of comment by css-meeting-bot Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5913#issuecomment-844290779 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Wednesday, 19 May 2021 16:57:12 UTC