- From: Eben Sorkin via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 15 May 2021 17:22:18 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
I wish we were aiming for defining intended arc minutes in the eye. (Amin or arcm anyone?) But we are not looking at trying to calculate that and especially not responsively. So we are arriving at a best guess through assumed reader distance + reproduced scale. The fact that we are working to what is ultimately experienced in arc minutes in a such an oblique way seems like a big part of the reason discrepancies in terminology and definition are making progress hard. My comment is I admit a bit too casual. But I don’t like the idea of settling for pixel or reproduced size definitions that don’t include the lived reading experience except by implication. Sent from my iPhone > On May 15, 2021, at 11:12 AM, Dave Crossland ***@***.***> wrote: > > > I also wonder if it's time for another axis/axes, like "ptsz" and or "pxsz", which can be more carefully implemented, and opsz can be deprecated. > > — > You are receiving this because you commented. > Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe. -- GitHub Notification of comment by EbenSorkin Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4430#issuecomment-841696492 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Saturday, 15 May 2021 17:22:31 UTC